Conversation
|
Before the fix locally After the fix locally |
jnwei
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall looks good! Thanks for the quick fix
I went to check the action log associated with the most recent commit. It look likes no code coverage artifact was generated for this run.
Could you double check the path of the coverage report and see that it matches with the argument provided to the upload action?
|
Agreed, that is a bit fishy – also the term coverage report didn't print anything (odd) |
|
@jnwei this looks good – the manually triggered GH action has the correct artifact https://github.com/aqlaboratory/openfold-3/actions/runs/21168437686#artifacts |
jnwei
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome! Thanks for adding this
|
Very happy to – @sdvillal slight duplication with your PR because we added 'pytest-benchmark' but I don't think this will cause a huge amount of pain (you've probably dealt with most conflicts like this already) |
|
I already merged this into the branch, and no worries about conflicts - we do not know when will we merge the big PR and we cannot stop the world until then :-) |
Summary
#90 introduced pytest-cov and pytest-xdist but these were placed under the 'dev' instead of the 'test' dependency group.
Changes
Related Issues
Testing
Other Notes